IBMS publishes guidance on GenAI in education and training
The document is aimed at anyone who is supporting candidates undertaking IBMS qualifications, including: training officers, mentors, tutors and verifiers/examiners. It outlines the professional responsibilities associated with GenAI use in education and assessment. Whilst recognising that tools such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini are now widely used for study support, drafting and reflection, the guidance stresses that candidates must still demonstrate their own competence, judgement, knowledge and understanding. All work submitted must be authentic, explainable and professionally defensible.
The guidance also outlines examples of where use of GenAI is acceptable, such as helping candidates to organise ideas, improve clarity or identify areas for further reading. It also explains unacceptable uses, including generating evidence wholesale or submitting content that the learner cannot independently explain or justify. GenAI should be treated as an assistive tool rather than an authority and warns that AI-generated outputs can appear convincing while still containing inaccuracies or bias. It also reinforces the responsibilities set out within the HCPC Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics and the joint statement from UK health and care regulators on the use of AI in professional education.
A key theme throughout the document is the importance of professional dialogue. Regular discussions with candidates are encouraged as a way of confirming authenticity, understanding and readiness for practice. The guidance also advises those supporting candidates to familiarise themselves with generative AI tools to better understand their capabilities and limitations.
The IBMS recognises that GenAI can support learning but must never replace it, maintaining professional standards and patient safety remains paramount.
