Search

Complement testing

Controlled human infection models (CHIMs) allow researchers to deliberately infect volunteers with a carefully pre-defined viral inoculum and perform detailed investigations. These can examine both pre-existing immune responses and allow longitudinal sampling of multiple immunological compartments following infection. The unique nature of these CHIMs avoid the multiple confounding factors, which tend to limit conventional observational studies of naturally acquired viral infections in patients.

We have successfully established challenge models of influenza (H1N1 and H3N2), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV2, and used a variety of tools (such as multi-parameter flow cytometry, ELISpot, multiplex cytokine and chemokine arrays and transcriptomics) to characterise populations of low-frequency virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in both peripheral blood and cells in the upper and lower airways from challenge participants. We have also been able to extend our infection models into vulnerable populations, such as older adults, and use these techniques to investigate fundamental questions about the kinetics, specificities, and functionality of the cell-mediated response in these clinically relevant populations.

Challenge models allow us to probe the immune response to respiratory viral infections in a uniquely detailed manner. These advantages also make challenge models an attractive approach to testing the efficacy of novel vaccines and vaccine platforms, potentially leading to new vaccines and therapeutics, able to generate robust anti-viral immunity, while avoiding the significant risks and costs associated with traditional Phase II/III vaccine trials.

The session will provide an overview of the qualifications that the IBMS offers in those who are carving out a career in Histopathology after they have achieved their specialist level qualification. It will outline the DEP and ASD in Histological Dissection, DEP in Immunocytochemistry and the ASD in Histopathology Reporting qualifications and other related qualifications.

It will explain who these qualifications are aimed and provide an outline of how they are assessed, how candidates can achieve these qualifications and what roles successful candidates can go on to undertake.

The Royal College of Pathologists has led an initiative to improve the transparency and standardise the operation of external quality assurance for providers of clinical diagnostic testing in the UK. This project has resulted in the development of the EQA Governance Framework, bringing together the current system of the National Quality Assurance Advisory Panels and the other stakeholders. Most diagnostic service providers are aware of the Panels, to which the EQA providers report performance concerns relating to UK laboratories, but perhaps are less certain on the criteria for reporting and the involvement of other oversight bodies, e.g., the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency and the Care Quality Commission.

The EQA Governance Framework has been developed through four separate workstreams. Workstreams 1 and 2 cover the governance and description of the process and have developed a portfolio of documents designed to support a standardised approach to the investigation and resolution of performance concerns with individual laboratories and method related problems.

Fundamental to the management of laboratory performance is the definition of unsatisfactory or poor performance, for qualitative and quantitative testing, in terms applicable to all pathology disciplines, and the action points at which the EQA provider will consider the escalation of a performance concerns to the oversight process. A challenging aspect of the work has been the development of procedures to recognise and manage method-related performance concerns, especially when working with global providers of testing platforms.

This long-term project is intended to strengthen the oversight of diagnostic testing, ensure the sharing of learning points and best practice and benefit patient safety.

Digital Morphology for CPD. What can we learn about morphology reporting from the past 15 years?

Effects of direct thrombin inhibitors [dabigatran/argatroban/bivalirudin] on tests of haemostasis

EQA: What’s happening?

Equality, diversity and inclusion: optional extra or innate necessity? (why bother)

The Higher Specialist Diploma (HSD) is the main route for gaining Fellowship (FIBMS) status. In this session I will provide a brief overview of the IBMS Higher Specialist Diploma (HSD) qualification explaining the disciplines that the HSD can be undertaken in, who the qualification is aimed at and how the qualification is assessed.

I will then provide advice and guidance on the completion of the portfolio element of the qualification and explain what a good portfolio looks like. I will also briefly explain how to prepare for the exam element of the qualification. There will also be an opportunity to ask questions about the HSD.

This workshop on "How to publish your research" is delivered by the British Journal of Biomedical Science team. The aim of the workshop is to provide attendees with a clear understanding of the publishing process, so they feel empowered to submit their research to a peer-reviewed journal. As the British Journal of Biomedical Science is the official journal of the IBMS the workshop will provide members with the opportunity to discuss how they can engage with their journal.